Gameplay Suggestions

I know I am persona non grata but I am posting this anyway. If the team wants to get rid of bots, then the team has to put out a blanket ban on bot accounts. If you don't, you have to find a solution where manual players and bot players can co-exist. Just rebalancing rewards does nothing to increase the number of loots available to manual players. Based on the data Crab Radio and I have collected, the core complaints are: (1) concentration of rewards going to botters; and (2) looting is much more profitable than mining. Simply put, no player would want to loot if mining was more profitable than looting. However, this would cause emissions to explode. I want to pitch my solutions for complaints one and two, in turn. A proposed solution for number 1: cap the number of loot missions per day or put an added cooldown when the player wins the loot. By capping looting missions, you decrease the number of mines a bot can target. This opens up new targets for human looters. Now, add the complexity of the extra cooldown for winning the loot, and you take out the fact that looters are taking a bigger risk because they earn less rewards. Crabada quants will need to run the math on this to make sure looters still have a slight monetary incentive versus miners. Looters playing and winning are needed to control inflation. Otherwise, everyone would just mine (increasing inflation). A proposed solution for issue number 2: increase miner's revenge to 50%, lower the amount of rewards a looter can earn, and burn the difference between the old earnings and the new earnings. This will help reduce TUS emissions and make mining a more attractive option for players. Truthfully, I would like to see everything I outlined above as a comprehensive solution. My proposal is to do the following: (1) increase cooldown, (2) increase miner's revenge to 50%, and (3) lower rewards to looters and burn what the looter would have previously earned. It is vitally important the quants run the math on this and make sure that looting is slightly more lucrative, while at the same time not increasing inflation. We have to balance emissions v. people having an enjoyable experience.

energy system Every team they have 16 energy max. 1 energy = 1 loot zero cost energy to mine if the team already used the 16 energy on that day they cant loot anymore. They need to wait reset time or the next day for them to loot again If the team want to mine only they can mine all day with or without energy

部分玩家异常胜率和效率（90%以上）可根据其行为判定为脚本，希望能尽量多判别脚本保证游戏的公平性

player required to mine 2 times a day the remaining 16 hrs the player can choose to loot or mine Player cant loot if they dont mines 2 times in that day. Mamamia

Suggest to reduce number of loot per day (maybe 4-5) with shorter cooldown limit (1 hour) This will promote everyone for having. chance in looting and mining thanks

The only value for the CRA token at this stage is CRA tokens can be staked for amulets and entered into weekly drawings. IMO, this is not enough to sustain the CRA token value because CRA isn't even needed to run a profitable team. To fix this issue, I suggest making the amulets more valuable by reducing the number of teams a wallet can run at a time. Using multiple wallets is a work-around, but it is so inconvenient that most users won't take this step. I also suggest allowing people to sell their amulets in the marketplace.